Pluralism in homeopathy

Pluralism in homeopathy: A step forward that makes sense – or a step back to the days before Hahnemann?

An international discussion about modern trends, diversity of methods and genuine homeopathy

A few notes on the fundamental debate

This compilation of articles and statements was compiled in 2002/2003 and has since been published on the publishing house Grundlagen & Praxis website.

Since 2018 the publishing house unfortunately no longer exists and since then this important debate on the foundations of homeopathy and pluralism in homeopathy has not been open to the public. Now it has been published again on the website of the Materia Medica Pura Project and the CAH. The editors would like to express their sincere thanks for this.

Title page
0. Notes on the debate
1. Preface, englisch
2. Contents debate
3. Acknowledgement
4. To think about
5. Hershoff Healing Plants
6. Hayes Retraining with Mangialavori
7. Winston From the editor
8. Winston Book review
9. Olsen Doctrine of signatures
11. Kösters Annotations provings
13. Morrison Against Divisiveness
14. Winston The editor replies
15. Shepperd Call for common ground
17. Reichenberg Letter to the editor
18. Saine Hom versus Speculative Med
19. Anonym Letter to the editor
21. Robinson Hom, a phenmenal Med
24. Wright Toward Clarity
25. Heron Answer to Saine
26. Zirkind Reinventing the wheel
27. Morrison_On experimentation, Apr 2002
28. Saine Drawing a line in the Sand
29. Morrison_Olive branch, May 2002
30. Guess Editorial Preface
31. Morrison_Final Response
32. Jacobs Agree to Disagree
33. Moskowitz Fundamentalist Backlash

34. Shepperd Reply to Moskowitz
35. Saine Hom Nothing with Eclecticism
36. Sankaran Reply
37. Srinivasan Letter to the editor
38. Winston Cracking open a can
40. Dimitriadis Pure Observation
41. Tessler Question of Balance
42. Mundy Art and Science
43. Tessler Chhabra Interview
44. Habich Hahnemann’s reply
45. Shepperd Two Ways of Seeing
47. HANP Official Statement
48. Habich, Kösters, Rohwer Magic
49. International Declaration
50. Short Statements
51. Tessler Find a new way
52. McLaren Reminiscences
54. Gypser Concluding remarks
55. Bridger Meditational Provings
56. Baur Letter to A. Saine
57. Fuckert et al Clinical symptoms
58. Kaiser Why no one wants to become a homeopath
59. Wischner Homeopathy can a priori
60. Plate Homoeopathy or fictitious humbug
61. Hahnemann Essay new principle
62. Hahnemann Speculative Systems
63. Hahnemann Examination sources
64. Hahnemann Medical Observer

65. Hahnemann Spirit
66. Lippe Liberty Medical Opinion Action
67. Knott Clinical experiences
68. Buschauer authentic interpretation
69. Buschauer Homoeopathy
70. Dimitriadis Scietificity
71. Dellmour C4-trituration
72. Patel Modern trends
73. Bridger Up The Swanee To Atlantis
74. Dellmour similia principle
75. Rohrer Certainty
76. Saine Pure Homeopathy Our Legacy
77. Wichmann different tradition
78. Scholten Dogmatism in homeopathy
79. Pitcairn Positron and Mobil Phone
80. Pitcairn Ethics
81. Adams homoeopathic principles
82. Fäh Concern about Homeopathy
83. Meinhard Organon §21

Debate Pluralism in Homeopathy [FULL DOWNLOAD]Download

André Saine, D.C., N.D., F.C.A.H.

André Saine is a 1982 graduate of the National College of Naturopathic Medicine in Portland, Oregon. He is board-certified in homeopathy (1988) by the Homeopathic Academy of Naturopathic Physicians and has been teaching and lecturing on homeopathy since 1985. He is considered one of the world’s foremost experts on the subject of homeopathy.